Special Cargo
Wood packaging is regulated as a pest pathway, not as cargo. The rules apply to the pallet under your goods and the crate around them, and they apply whether or not anyone asked.
Contents
Solid wood packaging carries live pests. Larvae, fungi and nematodes travel inside pallets, crates, dunnage and the bearers under machinery, and they arrive in a country with no natural control on them. The damage is done to forests, not to the shipment.
The international standard for phytosanitary measures that addresses this is ISPM 15. It requires that solid wood packaging be treated to kill the pests and marked to prove it, before it crosses a border. Most trading countries apply it, and most apply it strictly.
The operational consequence is unusual in export practice: the packaging is regulated cargo in its own right. You can lose a container over a piece of wood you did not order and never looked at, which is why the subject deserves a line in the purchase order rather than an assumption.
The standard applies to solid wood packaging material: pallets, crates, boxes, drums, skids, and dunnage used to brace cargo. It also applies to bearers and blocking, which is where most of the surprises come from, because nobody thinks of the wood inside the container as packaging.
Processed wood is exempt, because the manufacturing process removes the pest risk. Plywood, oriented strand board, particle board, veneer and reconstituted wood are outside the scope. So is wood that has been manufactured and finished in a way that leaves no raw surface, as with some engineered panels.
The exemption is not a loophole. A crate built from plywood is exempt; the same crate with solid wood corner posts is not, because the posts are solid wood. A pallet with a plywood deck and solid wood blocks is assessed on the blocks.
Cardboard, plastic and metal packaging are outside the standard entirely. Where a buyer is choosing between a wooden crate and a heavy duty carton, the carton removes a compliance step as well as a cost.
Two treatments are recognised. Heat treatment raises the core of the wood to 56 degrees Celsius for at least 30 minutes, and is the default for most export packaging because it leaves no chemical residue and no re-entry interval. Kiln drying can qualify where the schedule is verified against the standard.
Fumigation with methyl bromide is the alternative, at a dose of 48 grams per cubic metre held for 24 hours at a minimum temperature, followed by aeration. It is effective, it is fast, and it is increasingly restricted: methyl bromide is an ozone depleting substance, and several markets restrict or phase it for packaging.
For a buyer the practical difference is timing. Heat treatment is done at a facility and takes as long as the schedule requires. Fumigation requires a chamber or a sealed enclosure, a registered operator, and an aeration period. Neither can be improvised at the gate, and a container that is already loaded cannot easily be treated afterwards.
Verification is the part that separates a certificate from an assertion. A heat treatment provider should be able to show the schedule, the probe placement and the record for the batch, because the standard is about core temperature and duration rather than about the surface of the timber. A provider who can only produce the stamp is a provider who may have bought the stamp.
Kiln drying is sometimes offered as an equivalent. It can be, where the schedule is documented and verified against the standard, and it is not equivalent simply because the wood is dry. Dryness is a moisture content, not a temperature history.
The mark is a rectangle containing the IPPC symbol, a country code, a provider registration number and a treatment code. It is applied by a registered treatment provider, not by the packaging manufacturer and certainly not by the factory that fills the cartons.
The country code should match the country of treatment, which is not always the country of export. The treatment code shows HT for heat treatment or MB for methyl bromide, sometimes DH for dielectric heating. The registration number identifies the provider and is the thing to verify if a mark looks doubtful.
The mark must be legible and applied to a visible surface. A stamp on the underside of a pallet, hidden once the goods are loaded, is a compliance argument at destination even if the treatment was real.
Debarked wood is often preferred, since bark can harbour pests independently of the wood, and some destinations require it. Where the mark includes a debarking indicator, that is what it refers to.
The same handful of situations recur, and the first one accounts for most of them.
None of these are fraud. They are the ordinary result of a factory using what is available, and they are the reason a buyer who cares about arrival dates asks about packaging before production rather than after.
Inspection at destination is usually visual and fast. An officer looks at the pallets under the goods, at the crate, at any loose timber inside the doors, and at whether the marks are legible. The check takes minutes and the consequence lasts weeks, which is an unusual ratio and the reason this subject belongs in the purchase order rather than in a conversation at loading.
Where wood packaging fails inspection, the usual options are re-export, treatment at destination under supervision, or destruction. All three are slow, all three cost money, and none of them happen while the container stays free.
| Outcome | What happens | Who pays, typically |
|---|---|---|
| Treated on arrival | Container held, packaging treated or replaced under supervision | Importer, then disputed with the supplier |
| Re-exported | Goods leave the country and are shipped again | Importer, with a claim against the exporter |
| Refused and destroyed | Goods and packaging disposed of | The party holding title at that moment |
| Detention while resolved | Storage and demurrage accrue daily | Whoever the terminal invoices |
Typical outcomes and cost allocation. Which applies depends on the destination's phytosanitary authority and the terms of sale.
Under FOB and CIF the cost lands on the buyer first and is recovered, if at all, by argument. That asymmetry is worth remembering when a supplier offers to save money on packaging.
Two sentences in the purchase order remove most of the risk. All solid wood packaging, including pallets, crates, bearers and dunnage, must be ISPM 15 compliant and marked with a legible IPPC stamp applied by a registered provider. No repaired or reused pallets without a valid mark.
Add a request for the treatment certificate, or at least the provider's name and registration number, with the shipment documents. It is not always required at the border, and it answers the question if one is asked.
Then check at loading. A photograph of the pallet marks and of the bracing inside the container, taken before the doors close, is the cheapest insurance in the file. It is also the evidence that settles an argument about whether the wood was already there when the container left.
Q Does every pallet need an ISPM 15 stamp?
Every pallet made of solid wood that crosses a border as packaging does, with narrow exceptions for processed wood products. Plastic, metal and cardboard pallets are outside the standard. A pallet without a legible mark is normally refused, not queried.
Q Is plywood packaging exempt?
Yes, plywood and other processed wood products are outside the scope because the manufacturing process removes the pest risk. A crate with plywood panels and solid wood corner posts is not exempt, because the posts are solid wood and need treatment and marking.
Q Can the factory stamp the pallet itself?
No. The mark is applied by a treatment provider registered with the national plant protection organisation, after the treatment. A stamp applied without treatment is a false declaration, and it is the kind of finding that escalates beyond the individual shipment.
Q Which is better, heat treatment or fumigation?
Heat treatment is the more common choice for export packaging because it leaves no residue and no aeration delay. Methyl bromide fumigation is effective and increasingly restricted, and some destinations limit it. Both are accepted where correctly applied and marked.
Q What about the wood used to brace the cargo inside the container?
It is packaging material under the standard, and it needs treatment and marking. Loose offcuts added at loading are one of the most common findings in a container inspection, because nobody ordered them and nobody checked them.
Q Does ISPM 15 apply to goods shipped by air?
The standard concerns wood packaging moving in international trade, and air cargo is not exempt in principle, though enforcement concentrates on sea freight volumes. Where wood packaging is used, treated and marked material is the safe assumption regardless of mode.
Related pages
Send the packing specification and the destination. We will flag the wood packaging requirements that apply and what the loading photographs should show.
Email sales8015@goodhopefreight.com | WhatsApp & phone +86 133 9216 2503